Did You Know Subway ‘Jostling’ Is Against the Law?

Did You Know Subway ‘Jostling’ Is Against the Law?

August 02, 2011 at 3:12 pm

You lose your balance as the A train stops short, brushing against the newspaper and bag of a fellow commuter as you regain your footing. Have you just stumbled, or have you committed a class A misdemeanor, “Jostling”? Were a police officer to apply the statute’s vague wording and arrest you, and a judge to agree with the officer’s interpretation, you could be facing up to one year in prison.

Criminal justice advocacy groups believe that New York's vaguely worded statutes, like "loitering" and "disorderly conduct" permit the misuse of police power. Flickr/Leo Reynolds

Jostling, along with Criminal Trespassing, Disorderly Conduct, Loitering for the Purpose of Engaging in a Prostitution Offense and several other New York State laws contain broad and equivocal wording. Punishments for the above violations and crimes can potentially including jail time and heavy fines. Timothy Sandefur, the principal attorney of The Pacific Legal Foundation, condemns the serious consequences resulting from many vague laws on the federal and state level. “Vagueness,” he wrote in a 2010 Forbes op-ed “turns the law into a sword dangling over citizens’ heads.”

The Police Reform Organization Project, or PROP, a new organization that hopes to change what is calls the “ineffective, unjust, illegal, bullying and starkly racially biased” practices of the NYPD, believes that New York’s vaguely worded statutes permit the misuse of police power.

Jostling embodies this concern. According to New York State penal law, one has committed Jostling when he or she “places their hand in the proximity of a person’s pocket or handbag.” PROP believes unclear language of this sort “enable[s] police officers to charge individuals with crimes when no clear violation of the law has occurred.”

Of the 64,884 arrests for Disorderly Conduct in 2010, people of color accounted for over 51,000.

Concerns regarding vague misdemeanor statutes are probably as old as the laws themselves. Jostling in particular has been repeatedly attacked as unconstitutional under the void-for-vagueness doctrine, which cites statutes as “not definitive enough to allow ordinary people to understand what conduct is clearly prohibited through its wording,” according to common case law.

Multiple states that have adopted many of New York’s theft offense statutes specifically leave out Jostling, and the elasticity of the law has been debated in other states’ courts.

Subsections E and F of New York’s Criminal Trespass in the Third Degree law are cited as additional examples of indefinite language. “The law is less than fully clear,” explains Robert Newman, a staff attorney in the special litigation unit of the criminal defense division at the Legal Aid Society, speaking about public housing trespass violations. “Numerous people are being arrested [under subsections E and F] even though they are relatives of residents, or actual residents themselves.” The Legal Aid Society is one of a handful of organizations behind a pending federal lawsuit against the state’s trespass statutes. The plaintiffs’ hope is that reforms will be made to the law and the way police enforce it.

The Disorderly Conduct statute provides another instance of inconclusive phraseology. The violation’s subsections, which include “unreasonable noise” and “creating hazardous conditions,” have been cited many times in court, including in the 1959 case People of the State of New York v. Hugh Broadbent, as “insufficient in law to constitute a violation of the disorderly conduct section.” The broad phrasing of the law may also account, in part, for the 17,000 summonses for “unreasonable noise” that were given out last year. If a charge is vague, explains Robert Gangi, senior policy advocate at the Urban Justice Center, “it doesn’t take much to build a case that someone is guilty of that offense.”

Nor does it take much to see a racial pattern to the enforcement of the law. According to The Department of Criminal Justice Services, of the 64,884 arrests for Disorderly Conduct in 2010, people of color accounted for over 51,000.

Newman mentioned many residential complaints of overuse and abuse concerning the statute of Loitering for the Purpose of Engaging in a Prostitution Offense coming from Jackson Heights, Queens. He explained that many women, particularly those belonging to the Latina transgender community, say they have been targeted by police and sometimes arrested as alleged sex workers. “They will just be socializing, not soliciting any services,” Newman explained indignantly.

Read the full post at City Limits.


MetroFocus is made possible by James and Merryl Tisch, Sue and Edgar Wachenheim III, the Sylvia A. and Simon B. Poyta Programming Endowment to Fight Anti-Semitism, Bernard and Irene Schwartz, Rosalind P. Walter, Barbara Hope Zuckerberg, Jody and John Arnhold, the Cheryl and Philip Milstein Family, Janet Prindle Seidler, Judy and Josh Weston and the Dr. Robert C. and Tina Sohn Foundation.


© WNET All Rights Reserved.

825 Eighth Avenue

New York, NY 10019