The piece seems to be a metaphor for something larger than
the specific characters that are in it, and I was wondering what prompted
you to make it, and what were some of the overriding ideas you were working
through in the piece?
What prompted me to make it is a combination of growing up in that
environment in New York City, in Times Square, and being bombarded by all
these different mediums, these different messages, these different noises
and sights and sounds that just overwhelm you as you walk through Times
Square. Part of what shaped me was being assaulted by media all my life in
different shapes and forms and becoming, sort of, interactive with that
media and becoming media-literate in a lot of different ways -- understanding
what all these different messages and different types of sounds mean,
understanding who's saying them, why they're saying them to me, and really
taking ownership over my environment. I felt that the best way to take
ownership, the best way to really understand it and comprehend it and
articulate it would be to try and process it, through making a film, a
video, about it. I would try and capture what it has inflicted on me all my life
and, sort of, explain it and show it and do it in a way that's not
preachy, that's not static, that's not dull. I felt that the metaphors
that I used were the way of taking someone who is young, obviously someone
who is photogenic, and sort of marching them through -- at a heightened pace
-- all these experiences that I've been going through all my life. And
just have it all come crashing down on him and just overwhelm him.
So, this character seems like he's really inundated with all of
the images and sounds, to the point where he's trying to block it out.
But, then, at the end of the tape, his friends come and say, "Hey, let's go
to a movie." Can you speak about that?
Yeah. Part of it is that you're not in it alone. Even if you feel like
it's you against the world, you're not in it alone. Even if your friends
don't get it the same way you do, they're there and they're part of that
stimulation, that over-stimulation that overwhelms you. And at the same
time, they're what keeps you sane or keeps you in touch with reality. And
them coming in at the end is, like, them keeping him in touch with reality
and at the same time, contributing to that overwhelming feeling. They
don't really help him block it out. They don't really help him deal with
it. They just, sort of, become part of it. They become part of that
overstimulation.
When you're on a subway car and your friends are chit-chatting,
you're in that conversation but you're also involved in the sound of the
subway running through the tunnel. You're also involved in everyone else's
conversation in the subway train, or walking down the street, or whatever.
You're involved in numerous stimulations and sources whenever you're
anywhere in New York City. And your friends just become part of that
stimulation.
Can you talk about the different effects that you
used in the tape and the reason that you chose to use those effects?
Originally, I shot the whole thing on film, and it was going to be a
film, but what I felt is that it didn't entirely work solely as a film,
because it needed those additional enhancements. It needed that additional
layer, on top of it -- taking the film and then transferring it to video,
and then projecting it on a video screen and then shooting that with video
-- which gives it a completely different texture and feel and meaning, and,
in a way, was another layer to the different types of mediums, different
types of textures, that are being inflicted upon this boy.
And, that's interesting, how, then, the images
become further mediated.
They become further mediated, they become further contextualized
within his world. And it also, using video, which I have a lot of
experience with, allowed me to edit it much more fluidly and at a
different pace. So it was also a practical thing, converting from film to
video. Just, for me, having more experience and having more comfort and
access to video allowed me to continue working on it and not just do one
edit, but rather to do multiple versions of it and really have the message and the
story evolve over those different edits.
And, how about the sound?
The sound, actually ... I did the film for my moderation project at
college, and I was told, "Well, you have this idea about all these
stimulating media, why not take a class with electronic music?" So, what I
was able to do was to get on a sequencer and sample all these sounds that
I had recorded in the city, and play with them and put them through
different effects. Part of what the sound evolved into was having access
to working with this computerized digital equipment and learning these new
systems, and being able to play with different effects and different
sequences of noise, and looping and having at some points 20 different
tracks of sound all interacting at different levels of volume and mixing
them right there, as opposed to film or video, where you have two tracks of
mag or two tracks of audio. It's just much more cumbersome on film or
video, whereas, on this digital system, you have a lot more freedom and a
lot more layers that you can create.
So, then, that further underscored this cacophony of other images
and sounds?
Not only does it underscore it, it also takes on this other meaning,
being a product of all this overstimulation. When I became a film and
video maker, a media maker, I end up overstimulating my audience with all
these different tracks, and finding these ways to create multiple levels of
meaning. Because all my life, I've been hit with these multiple levels of
meaning, and I am the product of my own demons.
Did you work with Rise and Shine when you made this?
Well, I always work with Rise and Shine. I've been working with
Rise and Shine since the first video project I ever did in 6th grade with my mother [the Director of Rise and Shine] and my sister. So Rise and
Shine for me is very much a family organization. I use Rise and
Shine editing facilities to do all my alternate versions of the piece, and
I also worked with them as a sounding board. You know, showing them
different versions, what needed to be worked on, and having different age
groups watch it and understand different things.
Rise and Shine is, for me, a school. It's a house. It's a family.
It's the best sounding board I could ever have, consisting of this myriad
of age groups, of relatives, and of friends.
And for people who might not know what Rise and Shine is...
Rise and Shine Productions is a youth media arts organization that
does a number of things involving all ages, from elementary school up.
They have an intergenerational program, which involves senior citizens, so
it really works with everyone in the community. It goes into schools, does
video integrations curriculum, after-school programs, drop-out prevention
and also runs three public access shows on Manhattan Neighborhood Network:
one being the Family Video Workshop, which is intergenerational; one being
the Reading Youth Council, which is a majority of young people,
elementary school and junior high school; and one being the Real Deal,
which is completely student-produced high school age, public access show.
So, it's this very wide, encompassing program.
Now your tape is going to be screened on
REEL NEW YORK after this piece called LOCKDOWN USA, which was produced by
Deep Dish. In that piece, there's a section that addresses how the media
has influenced youth into thinking that they must have money, and there are
a lot of young people who speak about ways they feel they've been
manipulated by the media to think like this. So, I like the fact that
these two pieces are playing together. And so, back to your tape, do you
have any interesting stories either about when you were shooting the piece
or when the piece was being shown to different audiences?
Well, hearing that my piece is being screened with Deep Dish's
makes me really happy. Because if Deep Dish's piece is about being
manipulated by the media as a young person, my piece, in a lot of ways, is
about being a young person who has learned how to manipulate the media, how to respond and to interact, and that's what Deep Dish has been
advocating -- even though I came upon Deep Dish after -- I feel I have
learned how to manipulate the media. I have their bumper sticker
on the side of my television: "Don't just watch TV, make it. Support
Public Access TV."
You know, to me, Deep Dish is great and there's many different
people, organizations, collectives out there doing the same thing,
making their own TV. I'm actually writing a paper on Deep Dish right now
for a video art class. I mean, it's hysterical. I was researching this
paper and then I get the letter from you and I see that I'm paired out
with Deep Dish. How much more perfect could the world be?
That's great. I love it when things sync up like that.
Oh. But a funny story about shooting the films... I got a camera
from the school, went down to New York City, and shot eight rolls of film.
Had it all developed and it turns out the camera was broken. Got home.
The variable shutter on the camera was broken and there was no way to fade
back in. So, I had eight rolls of unexposed, but developed film. All
black. So, I ran around, trying to figure out where I could get another
16mm camera before I had to go back to school, to shoot the rest of the
film so I could pass the class.
So, I ended up buying the cheapest 16mm camera I could find, a cheap
Russian camera, reshot everything the day before I went back up, developed
the film in one day. I did a much more rushed but much more informed
reshoot. I had already shot it once, so I knew exactly what I wanted to do
and I knew exactly how I could do it better, even though I didn't get to
see the footage. So, it was, kind of, one of these lessons that, you know,
things don't always go right. Sometimes they go wrong for the better.
Do you have anything you want to add about the tape, or thoughts in
general?
Working with Rise and Shine all my life has been about manipulating
media and media images through other people's voices, through other people's
words or actions. I very rarely have been the person who said, "Okay, this
what this piece is going to be about. This is my vision." I've, in a lot
of ways, been someone who's taken someone else's initial vision and
amplified it and turned it and made it develop, or come along, or I come in
at the end of the piece and save the piece in editing. And this was really
a piece that I did completely on my own, that was completely my own vision
from start to finish. It was one of the first ones that I could really say
was a hundred percent mine. I had complete ownership over it and I felt
like I gave birth to completely by myself. And that was, sort of, a great
experience, to finally stop using other people's words and really figure
out for myself what it was that I wanted to say, to really nurture my own
vision.
Well, there's a great energy to the piece. I think that it does speak really clearly to these ideas that you're
discussing, and it carries itself really nicely to a viewer because of the
energy that's behind it, so that spirit of wanting to do that translated
really nicely in terms of the pacing, in terms of the rhythm of the piece.
It is so energized and it's so present and I really like that about it.
Thank you. Actually, you know what I just realized? When I
initially presented the film to my moderation board on film, there was this
overwhelming feeling of discouragement from me taking on some sort of
monumental task as to try and respond to the media, to try and make
something with an actual message and had an actual meaning behind it. And
there were comments made like, why don't you just take this adorable little
boy and walk around New York City and do a landscape, something like that.
And, to me, it was not only did they not get it, probably because it
needed a lot more work -- and I did put a lot more work into it -- but
also, how dominant it is for young people to be encouraged to be satisfied
with art for art's sake, with something that just looks good. I have this
overwhelming feeling that, you know, young media makers and filmmakers are
just responsible for something very minor and not something that has any
meaning or says anything, that we, as young people, don't have anything
important to say.
And I think that's a lot of what my piece is about: we, as young
people, have a lot to say and we have a lot to contribute. What Rise and
Shine has really taught me and really encouraged me to develop is that
everyone has a voice that's worth listening to and how you develop your
voice and how you pull voices out of other people, especially people who
feel like they're disenfranchised and they're unimportant. It's just a
shame that a majority of adults and the majority of the people in positions
of power in the media world and the film world don't get it, don't
understand that young people have something to say and don't understand
that it's important to encourage those voices. It's important to not
dismiss someone's attempt at saying something significant, if it comes out
mumbled at first, but to try and get them to rearticulate themselves until
they actually make some sort of sense and make some meaning out what
they're trying to say and what they're trying to do.
Right. That's a really good thing to add. I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Home
| Interviews | Thirteen Online
|