Reel New York Interview
Home | Interviews
Thirteen Online



INTERVIEW WITH JANIE GEISER

The Red Book

Series curator Kathy High conducted this telephone interview with Janie Geiser in May, 1997.

Q: Where did the impetus for making this piece come from and what is the over all meaning of it? It's really dense. I find that this work, particularly, has many different things in it. I think there's a lot there about women's identity and dealings with culture, and things like that. So, if you could just speak a little bit generally about it...

J.G.: Well, it started actually about ten years ago. I had read this book about a man who had lost his memory by actually being shot in the head. And it just started a kind of series of readings and paintings and different things on the issue of memory, and through that gestation came this story of this woman who loses her memory through a fall. That's the literal starting off point. It's about a woman who has lost her memory, but that becomes a more metaphoric kind of story, too. In this loss of memory, she has aphasia, which is known as short term memory loss. And when you have that, you really lose a lot of your ability to communicate and to hold thoughts in your mind. And it started me thinking about how language is so important to identity and how we're defined culturally a lot by what we say, what we think, and what the culture says about you. And so there are a lot of images in the film, say, where she's writing and the writing disappears immediately. Without this sort of intersection point into culture, you know, and without memory, you have no sense of your own identity. You kind of lose who you are. So that's the literal place where it all comes from.

But then from there, the way that I work is using a starting off point and then associating in different directions with that. So one thing that happened is that while I was working on these ideas, I had this dream that felt like it was part of the story -- I was watching these hands writing in the dirt and they were writing these hieroglyphs, and then the hieroglyphs turned into architect's plans. It made sense with the piece somehow -- the architecture of the body, and images of home and body, and how women are so associated with those kind of places. So, that formed another thread through the piece. And then also leaving it a question as to how she has this fall. There is this male figure that's kind of haunting her through the piece. You know, thinking about people like Anna Mendietta, the artist -- did Carl Andre push her or did she jump or fall? So that's kind of woven in there, too. Was there some malevolence involved or not? So those are some of the main threads.

And what happens is there actually is somewhat of a line that goes through the piece, but it's almost like it starts in a flashback where she's on this operating table. And you see her sort of traveling through spaces and up this elevator and into this hallway, and then you see this fall. And then the hallway returns again and again, as if she's trying to get home. And in the end, she comes to this door and opens it up and it's like she's come home. But nothing is solid, so the room is spinning around and when it finally stops then the city outside falls down. So, she's completely lost all of her base, and it's just very hard to live and define yourself.


Q: I think the thing that's really interesting about the piece is the way that it's, for the most part, languageless. There's that little bit of text that you were referring to that disappears; there's the little bit of text that is uncovered. It's the same way she's uncovered, her face is uncovered. And there's a little bit of chatter in some of the soundtrack. But for the most part it really doesn't have any language. And was that a choice partly to point to this loss of language that she might have been going through?

J.G.: Well, sort of the incomprehensibility. But it's also that I really like to work without dialogue a lot. It's a preference. I mean, I work with language also, but to me [working without dialogue] kind of a freer place to work. And with this piece I wasn't trying to, make a literal narrative, but more what I call an emotional narrative. You're going through something, but I don't necessarily expect someone watching it to get the literal story that I'm starting out from. But I think you get some kind of feeling that comes through. And that's going to be very subjective in terms of how you see it...like some people say, "Oh I see so much about how hard it is to live in New York City."


Q: Well, in fact, you took so much from the city because there's the soundtrack itself which is so rich with these industrial sounds. How did you create that? Was that a process of going out and collecting sounds?

J.G.: Some sounds I collected, and then I worked with this sound designer, Bale Moralis, at Harmonic Ranch and we just, you know, started collecting sounds that we liked. And it was a fairly long process creating the sound track, working back and forth, sitting there with ProTools and just playing with different things that we liked against different parts of the film, and coming up with this very dense sound track... You know, the density has to do with the indecipherability in some way - for [the woman in the film].


Q: Do you want to talk a little bit about some of the choices you made in terms of the animation techniques and just how those processes happened?

J.G.: I made several little painted books as I was thinking about the film and came up with key images that I knew I wanted to create in the film. It's all painted backdrops and painted cut out figures, and a few photographic figures that I painted on also. And so the first part of making the film was simply painting and gathering materials until I felt that I had critical mass enough to begin to animate. And so I started with the animation of those key images, but then as I was working on those, other ideas would suggest themselves. It was then kind of a phase where I would combine and recombine some of the things I had made, or make more things or find certain things. Like I had seen years ago in this store on Fifth Avenue that sells miniature, little miniature sets of silverware, so that came to mind. I thought with this kind of domestic memory that she has to have that this silverware falling would work. So some things were suggested by materials I knew about or had seen, or saw while I was in the process of making the film. It took about a year working on it off and on. I didn't work on it continuously and that was kind of a good process because new ideas would come and materials would come to me, and certain things I just found on the street. And I knew I wanted to use a lot of superimposition in it. So then really developing that process and getting better at doing that -- it's all done in the camera. So it was kind of a long gestation process with this film.


Q: Do you have an animation stand that you work with?

J.G.: I have a 16mm Bolex on a tripod, and I work either just putting materials on a table or on the floor. I don't really have an animation stand. Some of it...when she is falling over the city, I made this city that was kind of almost between two and three dimensional. It's two dimensional, but it's mounted on a background standing up in such a way that it creates shadows. So that's about as technical as I got doing that.


Q: You mentioned one image that came out of a dream. But there are a lot of dreamy images in this. Where there images that just kept coming back to you? And how did they crop up into your consciousness?

J.G.: Well, this image of the body being split apart was very early a key image, and it's one of those images that kind of just came to me, and I trusted that it was right. There was something about these hands coming in pulling her body apart which felt emotional right for her predicament. And then also the way that the medical field responds to certain personal issues, and how they try to fix it or not fix it in ways that aren't always helpful. So that was one of those images. And that was one of these things that the first time I shot it, and I shot it in different sections, it came out just right. The sections even functioned as edits that I didn't even have to cut. And that doesn't happen very often. The rhythm of it was really right, somehow I had been thinking about it enough that it turned out right. And the last scene where the room is spinning around was something that was also just kind of an intuitive image that I felt the necessity for the circularity at the end and the confusion of that. And that was three different passes in the camera. So, luckily that one I got right the first time.


Q: There is this notion of circularity that comes up a lot. I mean, even in her going up this endless elevator, and there are lots of things that just keep repeating and repeating. It seems as if she's trapped or as if her life has become very elliptical in a way.

J.G.: Right, that's a good word for it.


Q: Was that something that you set out to do or was that something that developed in the process of making the film?

J.G.: I think that that really developed in the process and then came to fruition in the editing. You know, when I was editing first, which I often do, I kind of set it out in a more linear way to just get in everything that I wanted to use. And then I knew that that wasn't right, so I started working with this more elliptical structure of large circles becoming smaller and smaller as the film went on. Like something that starts out sort of slowly rolling down a hill and then picks up speed as it gets to the bottom.


Q: It's also interesting how you've conveyed these ideas of things being obscured and becoming revealed in it. As I said before, images like the dirt being rubbed away from the book, and then also from her face later on...

J.G.: Yeah, there's also images with a key, which is one of the real objects in the film. Before she falls, this key falls, and it's a very "Alice in Wonderland" kind of image to pull out but those are from all of our collective unconsciousness. There is something about a key to the door. And so the key appears and reappears. And it sets off the very last sequence, too, that she finally gets the key in the door, and then actually everything that was moving in a certain direction now starts moving backwards, so the circle kind of moves in a different direction. And the sound goes backwards at that point for a little while. So it's that she finally gets to the door, but then it's almost like a tornado hits.


Q: And what about the choice of the colors?

J.G.: Again, right when I first started thinking about the piece and making these paintings, [the colors] just happened. And part of that was this dream that I had was in black and white and red. There's something about the limitation of that, and then the archetypal quality that it adds to the piece. Sometimes limitations actually open things up, and I think that that's what that did for this piece.


Q: Yeah, there's something kind of frightening about that -- the combination of those three colors in this piece -- that works.

J.G.: Right, and it's also without ever showing blood, you have the feeling of blood.


Q: And then, also, something is sort of ominous because things are really very graphic and very dense in this, too. Did you have anything unusual or funny happen while you were making it that you want to talk about?

J.G.: Gosh, because I'm just working by myself most of the time, if something funny happens nobody is there to see it.


Q: Over all thoughts on the production?

J.G.: It was one of those pieces that really needed time. You know how some things that you make you're fairly clear about it, or there's some concise quality about it that allows you to just go forward. But this was one of these pieces in which I didn't set out with a deadline, and I was really happy about that because I allowed it to develop in this way that I think was a lot richer for having the time to do it. This isn't always a luxury that we have, you know.


Home | Interviews | Thirteen Online