Does Knowing Count? Comparing Urban Bus Tracking Systems and Ridership

| March 28, 2012 4:00 AM | Updated: March 29, 2012 1:54 PM video

An MTA driver takes a break in Manhattan. The BusTime service, which allows riders to find out when the next bus is coming, is set to expand. Flickr/vincent ☆

Will a high-tech prototype system that tells New Yorkers how far away the next bus is make it worth the wait? The test run of the MTA’s BusTime in Staten Island indicates the GPS-based mobile app could boost lagging ridership rates. MetroFocus takes a look at how other cities have rolled out similar systems, and how ridership has fared.

Public transit ridership rose nationally in 2011, according to a report by the American Public Transportation Association in March. But as new MTA data shows, New Yorkers are bucking the trend by neglecting one core piece of transit infrastructure: city buses. Bus ridership dropped 4 percent between 2010 and 2011, compared to an overall 0.4 percent increase across the county. At a time when the MTA is projecting budget deficits of $141 million and $211 million in 2014 and 2015, respectively,  increased ridership is certainly needed.

Many New York City transit experts and pundits complain that riders’ inability to gauge when the next bus will arrive compounds a host of related problems — budget cuts, bunching, outdated routes, not enough lanes on busy roads, or lanes that are shared with other vehicles — that frequently render bus schedules inaccurate.

WATCH VIDEO:

OpenPlans, a New York City-based firm that uses open source applications, introduced BusTime on the B63 in Brooklyn. It launched in Staten Island with additional work by Cambridge Systematics, a national transportation firm with a New York City office. The New York-based tech firm, Mobile Commons, enabled BusTime’s text messaging. Video courtesy of the MTA.

 

The MTA’s Bus Time program allows riders with mobile devices to send a text or scan a code at the bus stop to find out how many stops away the next bus is. The service only exists on special routes, where all of the buses have been fitted with GPS devices. The MTA began testing it on two Manhattan routes back in 2010, then expanded it to Brooklyn’s B63 line in 2011. After ironing out some kinks with the GPS, Staten Island became the first borough to have all of its bus lines linked into the BusTime system in January.

By March, 10 percent of Staten Island bus riders were using BusTime, and the program will soon be brought to the 34th Street line in Manhattan. By the end of 2013, the MTA plans to have BusTime installed on every bus in New York City. While it’s too early to say whether the high usage of the service will translate to increased ridership — and the system is limited to people with mobile phones, after all — the MTA and transit bloggers are excited.

Similar digital, bus time-tracking services have been implemented in other big cities, including Chicago, Portland, San Francisco and Los Angeles in recent years. How does the technology work in those cities, and has ridership increased in the time since? MetroFocus looked at Chicago, Portland and San Francisco (Los Angeles’ bus tracking system is operated by the same company as in San Francisco, NextBus).

Chicago — Bus Tracker

Service: The Chicago Transportation Authority (CTA) rolled out Bus Tracker in 2008, using GPS systems to track certain bus routes and providing information to mobile device users. Unlike BusTime, however, Bus Tracker tells riders the estimated arrival time, instead of just how many stops away their bus is. In 2009, the CTA began installing screens in some Chicago shops, so that people could see when buses were coming without using a phone. There was so much demand that in September 2011, the CTA turned the service into a $3.8 million program, installing LED signs at over 400 bus stops throughout the city, and in many stores and restaurants.

Impact: As detailed in Atlantic Cities, it’s very difficult to determine whether time-tracking techniques cause changes in ridership, but a study released last June by Transportation Research found a “modest increase” in ridership on routes that had Bus Tracker signs installed. On average, Bus Tracker routes had 126 more weekday riders per month than routes that did not — a 1.8 to 2.2. percent increase — according the study. Transportation Research advised the CTA to better market the service to people who don’t already use public transit. Overall, Chicago’s bus ridership increased by 1.42 percent between 2010 and 2011, according to the American Public Transportation Association’s report.

WATCH VIDEO:

Streetfilms’ Elizabeth Press looks at the Chicago Bus Tracker system. Video courtesy of Streetfilms.

 

Portland — TransitTracker

Service: Portland’s TriMet transit system installed GPS on its entire fleet of buses way back in 1997, after one of its employees worked with transit officials in London, where the first time tracking system for buses was implemented in 1992. Under Portland’s system, TransitTracker, bus arrival times were listed on signs at city bus stops, and the data was updated every 90 seconds. In 2005, TriMet became the first transit agency in the United States to open its data to the public, allowing for the creation of over 35 transit-related smartphone apps. Many of the apps track bus arrival times, and contain various features that add value to the schedules. People with non-smartphones can send a text for arrival times. In 2010, TriMet created its own mobile site where all TransitTracker arrival times are listed. And in 2011, TriMet created a Quick Response code app, which allows smartphone users to scan codes at all bus stops in order to access TransitTracker arrival times.

Impact: There aren’t any public reports that directly links the apps to ridership changes, though the American Public Transportation Association report says that Portland bus ridership dropped .47 percent between 2010 and 2011. However, on March 13, TriMet reported that weekday ridership grew 3.6 percent between 2011 and 2012, and weekend trips by 4.7 percent.

San Francisco — NextBus

Service: San Francisco’s transit authority contracted the company NextBus in 1999 to install a GPS tracking system on a select number of buses. Signs were installed to show bus riders when their ride was coming in real-time alerts, and between 2005 and 2007, the city installed the technology throughout the entire transit system. In 2009, NextBus became available as a smartphone app, and its use skyrocketed over the course of the following year. Around the same period, San Francisco began releasing its transit data to the public, which resulted in a series of privately created bus time-tracking apps.

Impact: A 2011 study by the tech research company Latitude found that mobile users in San Francisco and Boston said there was a direct relationship between how much information they had access to about transit and how likely they were to use transit. According to the American Public Transportation Association, San Francisco’s bus ridership increased .83 percent between 2010 and 2011.

  • Larry Rosenshein

    Mr. Farley – NextBus is pleased to see your review of the different systems. You missed a few key features that make a huge difference to riders. NextBus not only provides how many minutes away the bus/train is (as opposed to the test in Staten Island showing how many stops away – not very useful to most riders), we also provide a simple telephone voice system that is ideal for senior citizens and the blind – they don’t need a smartphone or need to know how to text to find out when the bus is coming. And because NextBus serves over 95 transit agencies (LA, DC, Toronto, Boston et al.), we’re a true Software as a Service – when we make improvements to our system – i.e adding Spanish and French capability – all agencies benefit. The MTA’s test system is stand-alone; making it much more expensive to manage and operate (we bid on the Brooklyn test at half the price offered by Open Plans but were rejected because our solution is not wholly Open Source). Anyone who wants to compare the MTA’s Test System with NextBus need only go to: http://www.nextbus.com/predictor/prediction.shtml?a=staten-island&r=S40&d=S40_1_var0&s=200063&ts=200064 NextBus has taken the raw bus location data, made predictions and built out all of our features for Staten Island’s riders. Try the SMS texting and the telephone system we’ve set up. NextBus also has a GPS enabled mobile site – go to http://www.nextbus.com on your smartphone – and you’ll see a list of stops/predictions in proximity order. Riders love this. In LA over 60 percent of riders use their phones to get our predictions and we’ve seen a huge increase in usage in just 6 months of use. http://www.metro.net/nextrip

    Last, with NextBus – and you can’t see this at our website – we also provide a FULL backend of management reports and dispatch reports (Schedule Adherence, Headway Mangement, etc.) that can be used by the MTA to better manage their system – so that riders not only get predictions but a better run system. The MTA’s test system doesn’t include these tools. We’re hoping that the MTA will see its way to providing the best solution for its riders.

    We applaud the MTA for adding the GPS hardware to its buses so that firms like NextBus can provide Real-Time Passenger Information to all – including the visually handicapped. But building out a software system to provide “how many stops away” the bus is might not be the best way to proceed. Why not build your own brake pad factory? Or tire factory? We can provide a better service at a fraction of the cost and with much less risk to the MTA and its riders and staff. Mr. Lhota, the new head of the MTA, is not wedded to the MTA’s test system and now has an opportunity to review the MTA’s test system and to see if it’s the best and most cost-effective way to serve the MTA’s bus riders.

    N.B. NextBus provides a public XML feed for its transit agency customers that allows third-parties to build different iPhone, Android and other apps for riders. We’ve actually sponsored contests for LA and Boston to encourage development of these apps. See Boston’s Apps Page: http://www.mbta.com/rider_tools/apps/

    Larry Rosenshein
    NextBus, Inc.

  • Roberto Gomez

    Great article – I just moved to NYC (Staten Island) from LA. I know – quite a change. I used LA Metro’s Nextrip system in LA for the past 8 months – works great and tells me by minutes – NOT STOPS – when the bus is coming. I was depressed to see the system that NYC Transit was testing – not very helpful. Especially for me since knowing the number of stops is almost useless, probably for locals too – if I know it’s 12 minutes (and I think Nextrip/nexbus is based on historical data, i.e. rush hour, time of day, etc.) then I know I have time to get a cup of coffee or spend a little more time at home. In LA it was always accurate to within a minute or so! I was delighted to see the comment by Nextbus that they are doing a pilot for Staten Island – now the information will be useful for me. I hope the MTA will see fit to adopt this standard and not the home-built thing they have.

  • Aaron Bannert

    Smart Ride for iPhone has supported Staten Island since January, and also has supported the pilot B63 line in Brooklyn since last year. It uses the ever improving NextBus data feeds and provides realtime arrival predictions, realtime alerts, GPS-aware nearby routes and stops, has maps and other great features. We were even named in Time.com’s top 50 iPhone Apps for 2012, and now have support for over 36 transit agencies around North America. Best of all it’s FREE and available TODAY. ( See http://www.codemass.com/smartride/ for more details. )

    I’m excited to see transit agencies such as NYC MTA taking up projects like this. Releasing public transit data to the public is an important step toward transparency and efficiency, and when apps like Smart Ride can take advantage of the data and provide a service to riders, it’s a win-win! I’m hopeful that NYC MTA will expand their real-time data sources to the rest of their system very soon.

  • thedude

    I love the smell of astroturfing in the morning.

↑ Back to top

About Us    Contact Us    The MetroFocus Team   Mobile   WNET Pressroom   Privacy Policy    Terms of Service

Ford FoundationMutual of America

Funders

MetroFocus is made possible by the Ford Foundation, James and Merryl Tisch, Cheryl and Philip Milstein Family, Charlotte and David Ackert, Jody and John Arnhold and the Dr. Robert C. and Tina Sohn Foundation. Corporate funding is provided by Mutual of America.
© 2014 WNET    All Rights Reserved.    825 Eighth Avenue    New York, NY 10019