[an error occurred while processing this directive]
American Masters Database
Home About Current Season Six Degrees Game Education Database
Edward Curtis: Dialogue
dressing up, whose idea was it anyway?
about this topic video message board poll

Curtis has been accused of dressing up Indian people in regalia and outfits they no longer wore, presenting false and stereotyped images of a vanishing race. Why did he choose to photograph only traditional Indian life, and how much did American Indians participate in the way they were represented in his pictures?

Curtis wanted to capture the beauty in Indian life in his photographs. For him, that did not mean showing the desperate conditions in which many Indian people found themselves. It meant capturing traditional ways as they had been before all the changes white people had brought with them. Curtis often asked Indian people to change from modern clothes into their best regalia or to dress the way their ancestors had, and in some cases, to re-enact ceremonies. In making his 1914 full-length film IN THE LAND OF THE HEADHUNTERS, Curtis had the Kwakiutl actors wear wigs, nose-rings, and cedar-bark costumes so they would look like their ancestors, when in their normal lives they wore blue jeans, calicos, and cotton shirts. Curtis wanted to preserve a record of what he believed was a vanishing way of life while people still remembered the old ways.

Indian people were very aware that their traditions were in danger of disappearing. Warriors were no longer allowed to fight, ceremonies were outlawed, and Indian children were being taken away to boarding schools where they were forced to forget their languages and traditions. When American Indians on reservations re-enacted battle scenes on horseback, or donned masks to perform potlatch dances for Curtis' camera, they were participating in making a record of traditions that had been outlawed, a record that would be of value to their children and grandchildren. When they entered Curtis' photographic tent, they would usually put on their best regalia in the same way Victorian ladies put on their best lace for portraits, and Victorian men their best suits. They wanted to be remembered as people of dignity who were still connected to their ancestors and to their traditions.

During the filming, I found ten people still living whom Curtis had photographed in their younger days, and they laughed to remember him asking them to put on formal traditional dress to grind corn or get water from the spring. They still wore these traditional clothes for important occasions, but not for the grimy tasks of grinding corn or fetching water. From their responses to the pictures, it seems that they and their ancestors had fun recreating traditional life for Curtis' camera.

At times, Curtis did impose his own preconceptions or narrative needs on his photographs in ways that did not accurately represent the culture. Gloria Cranmer Webster (Kwakiutl) pointed out that all the masked dancers shown in a Curtis photograph would never appear together at the same time, and that Kwakiutl people never hunted whales as they are seen doing in Curtis' 1914 film. Other Indian people protested that the pictures are romantic images that stereotype and dehumanize the people in them. A few pointed out that if Curtis had shown the real plight of people on reservations, his images might have led to government reforms that could have helped their ancestors.

-- Anne Makepeace